http://nirlog.com/2006/01/23/secure-remote-access-ssl-vpn/ Technology, Life and other stuff that come along... Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:16:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7 http://nirlog.com/2006/01/23/secure-remote-access-ssl-vpn/#comment-14998 Thu, 25 Jan 2007 07:13:55 +0000 http://nirlog.com/2006/01/23/secure-remote-access-ssl-vpn/#comment-14998 Hendra, <a href="http://www.darknet.org.uk/2006/03/ssl-vpns-and-openvpn-part-iii/" rel="nofollow">This</a> and <a href="http://nirlog.com/2006/11/09/openvpn-implementation/" rel="nofollow">this</a> and <a href="http://openvpn.net/howto.html" rel="nofollow">this</a> might be helpful to you. Hendra,
This and this and this might be helpful to you.

]]> http://nirlog.com/2006/01/23/secure-remote-access-ssl-vpn/#comment-14877 Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:43:52 +0000 http://nirlog.com/2006/01/23/secure-remote-access-ssl-vpn/#comment-14877 hello, how to configure openvpn server for Site to site VPN and Mobile VPN on one server hello, how to configure openvpn server for Site to site VPN and Mobile VPN on one server

]]> http://nirlog.com/2006/01/23/secure-remote-access-ssl-vpn/#comment-674 Mon, 15 May 2006 15:12:28 +0000 http://nirlog.com/2006/01/23/secure-remote-access-ssl-vpn/#comment-674 [...] They also talked about their SSL-VPN about which I’d written earlier. They mainly focused on technology side of SSL-VPN instead of their product and admitted their target is SME and cannot compete with Netscreen or Aventail on features. But pricewise they made it clear that they’re the only ones affordable by small companies. [...] […] They also talked about their SSL-VPN about which I’d written earlier. They mainly focused on technology side of SSL-VPN instead of their product and admitted their target is SME and cannot compete with Netscreen or Aventail on features. But pricewise they made it clear that they’re the only ones affordable by small companies. […]

]]> http://nirlog.com/2006/01/23/secure-remote-access-ssl-vpn/#comment-25 Thu, 26 Jan 2006 01:58:12 +0000 http://nirlog.com/2006/01/23/secure-remote-access-ssl-vpn/#comment-25 Thanks for pointing to the detail review. I agree that sonicwall is a poor mans ssl vpn (what to expect from $2000), I've got the first hand experience. Good to know that Juniper is doing that well! Anyway my main emphasis was on technology rather than vendor. I got chance to test only these 2 brands :) Thanks for pointing to the detail review. I agree that sonicwall is a poor mans ssl vpn (what to expect from $2000), I’ve got the first hand experience. Good to know that Juniper is doing that well! Anyway my main emphasis was on technology rather than vendor. I got chance to test only these 2 brands

]]> http://nirlog.com/2006/01/23/secure-remote-access-ssl-vpn/#comment-24 Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:24:50 +0000 http://nirlog.com/2006/01/23/secure-remote-access-ssl-vpn/#comment-24 "Current market leader is Aventail" - actually Juniper is market leader by far. It seems Sonic Wall stinks to high heaven. I suggest reading http://www.networkworld.com/reviews/2005/121905-ssl-test-intro.html?review=sslvpn IIRC infonetics placed juniper 1st, then f5, aventail, nortel and whale (not necessarily in that order). I've seen nortel critisized and f5 bashed for GUI that doesn't deliver. Aventail are just starting to get their act together. “Current market leader is Aventail” - actually Juniper is market leader by far. It seems Sonic Wall stinks to high heaven. I suggest reading http://www.networkworld.com/reviews/2005/121905-ssl-test-intro.html?review=sslvpn
IIRC infonetics placed juniper 1st, then f5, aventail, nortel and whale (not necessarily in that order).
I’ve seen nortel critisized and f5 bashed for GUI that doesn’t deliver. Aventail are just starting to get their act together.

]]>